![]()
Equine Species Working Group
| Frequently Asked Questions | Benefits | Information | Equine Species Working Group | Links |
EQUINE
IDENTIFICATION
Background
Many
in the horse industry are just learning of the national animal identification
plan and they are naturally concerned about it. Unfortunately, some of the information that is being
circulated about the concept and its potential impact on the horse industry is
misunderstood or inaccurate.
The
purpose of this website is to address these concerns, clarify the purposes of
the national identification system and its benefits, and explain how the horse
industry is responding and what it means to horse owners and breeders.
Various
sectors of American agriculture have been debating the issues surrounding the
institution of a national animal identification system for over a decade.
The primary purpose for a national ID system is to address animal health
emergencies. The original
proponents of a national ID system for livestock were the National Institute for
Animal Agriculture, the U.S. Animal Health Association and the livestock
industry itself.
The
diagnosis of a BSE-positive cow in Washington State showed how important an
accurate, rapid, individual animal identification system can be to trace the
origin and movement of diseased and/or exposed animals and to contain, control
and eradicate the disease in order to mitigate the health and economic effects.
That
BSE occurrence crystallized the support for a national ID system and prompted
the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to embrace the concept fully.
On April 27, 2004, Secretary of Agriculture Ann M. Veneman expressed the
Department’s full support and announced the framework for implementation of a
National Animal Identification System (NAIS) designed to identify any
agricultural premise exposed to an animal disease so that it could be quickly
contained and eradicated.
The
USDA is moving forward with the formulation of a National Animal Identification
System. Congress supports the
initiative and several bills have been introduced calling for implementation of
the system as soon as possible.
Purpose
of National Animal Identification System
The
NAIS is intended to establish a standardized, alpha-numeric system for animal
identification. The purpose of such
a system is to permit “trace back” within 48 hours of a confirmed diagnosis
of an animal disease. Ensuring
animal health in the US, and thereby our ability to market our animals,
is the primary reason the animal agriculture industry is looking at a
national, standardized, identification system.
The
NAIS proposes standards that can apply to all species, including horses,
although equines are not the principal focus now. In fact, the NAIS does not include a section on equine
identification at this time, although a place has been reserved for standards of
equine identification.
The
initial focus of the Plan is on food livestock, such as cattle, swine and sheep.
Nonetheless, the expectation is that other livestock groups, such as the
horse industry, will embrace the concept and develop their own national ID plans
under the parameters of the NAIS.
The NAIS would require the documentation of the following information:
An identification
number for each “premises” involved;
An identification
number for each horse that is part of the system;
Location, time and
date stamp so horses could be “traced” in the event of a major disease
outbreak.
Horse
Industry Involvement – Equine Species Working Group
The
concept of a national ID system for horses has been discussed at equine industry
meetings for the last several years. In
Fall, 2003, the American Horse Council organized a task force that included
nearly thirty national equine organizations. Its purpose was to evaluate the concept of a national ID
system and to determine if the horse industry could develop standards for equine
identification that would benefit the industry and be compatible with the plans
being considered.
This
task force has now been recognized as the Equine Species Working Group (ESWG) by
the USDA. It is chaired by Dan
Fick, Executive Vice-President of The Jockey Club, Dr. Marvin Beeman of
Littleton, Colorado, past President of the American Association of Equine
Practitioners, and Amy Mann, Director of Health and Regulatory Affairs at the
AHC.
Through
the ESWG, the horse industry is evaluating the overall plan, its benefits and
costs, and determining how the industry can develop standards for equine
identification that would fit into the system and help the industry.
The
members of the ESWG can be seen on this website. The ESWG has held several meetings and numerous conference
calls. It has formed subcommittees
to review in detail the many issues that still need to be thought through fully.
The subcommittees formed and their purpose include:
Identification and Technology Subcommittee to review what identification methods are appropriate and the technology available.
Premises
Identification and Responsibilities Subcommittee to review what premises should
be included in any equine tracking system and what responsibilities the premise
managers should have.
Movement Recording
Subcommittee to recommend what movements of horses should be tracked and
how.
Communications
Subcommittee
to keep the industry informed of developments regarding the NAIS
through media and educational materials on a national plan for the equine
industry.
Pilot Project
Subcommittee
to plan and draft an application when appropriate to USDA for
federal funds to test the initial effectiveness of an identification system for
the horse industry.
It
is important that the ESWG, as representatives of the horse industry, be
directly involved in preparing for this system and ensuring that if it becomes
mandatory the horse industry can operate within its guidelines.
If we do not do it, others will do it for us.
Issues
Raised by a National ID System
All
aspects of the issues of equine identification in disease management must be
studied to protect our horses and allow commerce to continue and our markets to
remain open in the event of a disease outbreak.
Many issues have been addressed and others must still be addressed by the horse industry, including:
The benefits of
national equine identification system for the horse industry.
What horses must be
included in the system.
What premises must
be included based upon the activities, disease threat and management practices in the horse industry.
What movements,
activities or events require the recording and/or reporting of data.
What is the most effective means of identification that is affordable and efficient.
What is the
implementation time table, including the schedule of when the plan might be
phased-in and realistic dates when the plan may be in place.
Cost sharing and
who pays for what.
Protecting any
information collected and restricting its access only to those authorities that
need it for disease control.
Industry
Input Sought
![]()